How central banks use digital currencies to reshape cross-border payments

How central banks use digital currencies to reshape cross-border payments

I’ve been tracking central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) for several years now, and one theme keeps coming back: they’re not just about digitizing cash at home. Increasingly, central banks see CBDCs as a strategic tool to rewire how money moves across borders. That’s a big deal. Cross-border payments remain slow, opaque, and expensive — but CBDCs could change the plumbing of the international monetary system in ways that affect businesses, remittances, sanctions enforcement, and even monetary sovereignty.

In this piece I want to walk you through how central banks are approaching CBDCs with cross-border payments in mind, what technical and policy choices matter, and what we should expect in the next few years. I’ll keep it practical: what does this mean for a small exporter in Lagos, a bank in Frankfurt, or a migrant worker sending money home from Madrid?

Why current cross-border payments are broken

Before we talk about solutions, it’s worth stating the problem. Today’s cross-border payments typically rely on correspondent banking networks. That system is:

  • Slow — transfers can take days.
  • Expensive — high fees, especially for low-value remittances.
  • Opaque — tracking and reconciliation are cumbersome.
  • Fragmented — different rails, messaging standards (SWIFT MT vs MX), and risk controls cause delays.
  • I’ve talked to businesses frustrated by stuck invoices and migrants surprised by big fees deducted from their transfers. Even big banks sometimes rely on intermediary banks in multiple time zones to settle payments. The inefficiency is structural.

    How CBDCs change the game — three core mechanisms

    Central banks aren’t building CBDCs as a single monolithic product. They’re experimenting with three distinct approaches that could reshape cross-border flows:

  • Direct interoperability: Two or more CBDCs are designed to be operable with each other, allowing near-instant settlement across jurisdictions.
  • Hub-and-spoke architectures: A shared platform or intermediary (often operated by a central bank or consortium) facilitates exchanges between CBDCs.
  • Conversion and atomic settlement protocols: Using smart contracts and atomic swap techniques to ensure that currency exchange and payment settlement happen simultaneously, removing counterparty risk.
  • Each approach has trade-offs. Direct interoperability maximizes speed but requires high trust and harmonized rules. Hub-and-spoke can be more practical at first but introduces central points of control. Atomic settlement requires robust legal frameworks and technical standards.

    Real-world experiments to watch

    Several central banks and consortia are already running pilots that reveal how cross-border CBDC use might look in practice:

  • Project mBridge — led by the BIS Innovation Hub with the central banks of China, Hong Kong, Thailand, and the UAE. It tests multi-CBDC platforms for wholesale payments and foreign exchange, using distributed ledger technology (DLT) to facilitate near-instant cross-border settlement.
  • Project Dunbar — another BIS-led experiment connecting multiple CBDCs to explore common standards and shared platforms for cross-border business-to-business payments.
  • Bridge initiatives between Sweden (e-krona) and the Baltic/euro systems — focusing on regional interoperability and offline payments.
  • These experiments matter because they move CBDCs beyond theoretical policy papers into interoperable systems. The technical choices made in these pilots — consensus mechanisms, privacy models, identity linkages — will shape future deployments.

    Key technical and policy design choices

    Not all CBDCs are created equal. The choices central banks make will determine whether CBDCs improve cross-border payments or simply replicate existing frictions in digital form.

  • Wholesale vs. retail CBDCs: Wholesale CBDCs (for banks and payment providers) can be integrated into existing correspondent banking chains and offer immediate benefits for high-value transfers. Retail CBDCs (for the public) could streamline remittances but raise policy and privacy concerns.
  • Interoperability standards: Agreeing on messaging standards, identity frameworks, and compliance interfaces (KYC/AML) is essential. Without standards, each CBDC risks being an island.
  • Privacy and compliance balance: Cross-border flows require AML/CFT checks. Central banks must decide how much transaction-level data to share across borders while protecting user privacy.
  • Liquidity management and FX mechanism: CBDC networks need liquidity arrangements and FX corridors. Will central banks provide intraday credit? Use real-time FX marketplaces? These choices affect stability and cost.
  • Who benefits — and who might be sidelined?

    There are clear winners if CBDCs are well-designed:

  • Small and medium-sized exporters gain from faster invoice settlement and lower FX costs.
  • Migrant workers could see cheaper, near-instant remittances.
  • Financial markets benefit from reduced settlement risk and tighter integration of payment and FX markets.
  • But there are risks and losers, too. Payment service providers that charge high remittance fees could lose revenue. Countries that fail to adopt interoperable standards might be sidelined in regional payment corridors. And there are geopolitical implications: CBDC linkages could shift financial influence if large economies create de facto regional hubs.

    Practical example: an instant cross-border invoice

    Step Traditional system CBDC-enabled system
    Initiation Exporter sends invoice; buyer initiates wire Buyer initiates CBDC transfer using a bank or e-wallet
    Conversion Multiple correspondent banks perform FX — takes hours/days Atomic swap between buyer CBDC and exporter CBDC executes instantly
    Settlement Final settlement after Nostro/Vostro reconciliations Immediate finality; funds available to exporter
    Costs High, opaque fees Lower fees, transparent FX rate

    What central banks need to get right next

    From my perspective, three priorities stand out if CBDCs are to genuinely improve cross-border payments:

  • Coordinate on technical standards early. Interoperability is a collective good that requires common protocols.
  • Build compliance rails that respect privacy while meeting AML/CFT obligations. That will require legal agreements and trust frameworks between authorities.
  • Design liquidity and FX mechanisms that prevent market fragmentation and ensure predictable costs for users.
  • Ultimately, the promise of CBDCs for cross-border payments isn’t just technical. It’s political and institutional. Central banks need to collaborate with other regulators, payment providers, and international organizations like the BIS and IMF. If they do, we could see a future where sending money across borders is as fast and cheap as sending an email — and where developing economies get a fairer place in global payment networks.

    I’ll be watching how pilots scale and which design patterns become dominant. For readers who send money internationally, run a business, or work in finance — prepare for change. The rails that have defined international payments for decades are being redesigned, and CBDCs are a central plank in that transformation.


    You should also check the following news:

    Science

    What to ask when reading scientific studies reported in the media to spot flaws

    02/12/2025

    When I see a headline about a new scientific study, my first reflex isn't excitement — it's curiosity. As a reader and editor, I've learned that...

    Read more...
    What to ask when reading scientific studies reported in the media to spot flaws
    Opinion

    Why the decline of local newsrooms accelerates misinformation in suburban communities

    02/12/2025

    I remember the days when the local paper arrived on my doorstep, a small ritual that tethered neighborhoods to a shared reality. It wasn't...

    Read more...
    Why the decline of local newsrooms accelerates misinformation in suburban communities